LET'S CREATE A NARRATIVE



Choose from the following characters:

'artist'
'critic'
'artist critic'
'publisher'
'editor'
'agent'
'distro'
'reporter'
'etc'

Together we can create a recorded narrative that occurs in 'real time' and whose history is sustained in 'real time'.
 



'Improv' existing historically.

Let's adopt voices like 'artist critic' and speak in those voices. The character of that voice is less important than the consistency of that voice. Being a 'caricature' online is way of interfacing with hundreds of people 'simultaneously'.

Let's explore our characters and in the process explore ourselves.



Let's create a narrative worth paying attention to. In order to compete as a subculture (as a product of 'indie' and 'art comics' comics) we will have to compete with / assimilate into other subcultures. In order to gain attention, resources and money we must ask ourselves what we can offer in return.

As illustrators we can offer a distinctive aesthetic and a 'personal touch':



We appeal to a creative and introverted audience:



We have the basic foundations for narrative laid out before us. Let's expand our audience demographics while at the same time appeasing our 'fan base'. Let's stop 'talking shit' in private, as audience members, and start enacting these narratives out on the stage.

Let's 'go all out' in our performances. Let's 'break down'. Let's humiliate each other. Let's 'fall in love'.



Let's create a community whose characters are accessible and whose actors are elusive. Let's 'play up' our characters' strengths and weaknesses. Let's make them shine.

We can do this.

21 comments:

Jeffrey Meyer said...

W

Jeffrey Meyer said...

T

Jeffrey Meyer said...

F

w said...

That last image makes me so happy about the future.

Blaise Larmee said...

@w that is a photo of my old improv group

zero reference said...

OK. I'll play the part of the miserable yet precociously wise artist-critic.

@Jeffrey Meyer,

I believe you're responding to the sublimated rage in Blaise's post, but misunderstanding the direction it is pointed in, perhaps because Blaise himself is as yet unaware (or not yet able to properly articulate) its target. It is a rage at the role art plays in a commodified society, at the commercial and competitive nature of creative acts which become reduced to 'new media' products. First and foremost, it is a rage at himself for engaging with and, like me, participating in the thing he hates. In self-expression an inwardly directed rage is projected outwards, so yeah he's also hating on us too.

He may not even believe this. It may not even be true. After all, I'm not citing sources or putting lots of time into my thought here, this is a blog post! Taking it seriously is ridiculous compared to the reality that awaits the direct mediation of our senses.

As for Blaises' blog, well we are the ones who get the last word in - it is the crowd that makes the star, and now every blog is Nabokov's Pale Fire, where the critic violently reconstructs a fantasy only to discover that he himself is a mirage.

Sorry to be so vague, but my irony isn't precisely dialed in quite yet. Yes, Blaise is pointlessly obtuse and infuriating and an easy punching-bag for people like us (you for your own reasons, for me as someone I can latch on to and use in establishing my intellectual bona fides, such as they are), and of course the pseudo-academic language makes no sense, or must have sense imposed upon it. Sense must be drawn out like blood from text with the needle of mirth.

I recommend going back and forth between reading the 'Hipster Runoff' blog and this blog. It is like viewing the same snake through a watery lense which softens and blurs the onrushing fangs.

The poison they bring is that dialogue has been abandoned here, artists must embrace cultural demagoguery in the service of creating a mediated self, i.e. a brand or perhaps an avatar so they can push a product.

The poison they bring is that art isn't talked about as a means for human uplift or enlightenment. Art is commercialized, spectacular, branded, a scam on the scale of Bernie Madoff except the pyramid never ends.

Blaise, my apologies to you for ripping on you in this post. You make a beautiful target. Thank you for your invitation to work and grow my own pixelated avatar in your electron garden.

Jeffrey Meyer said...

Suddenly I understand why Gregory Gallant abhors the present

i'm just sayin said...

masks are healthy

dont need to worry about it to much, unless your chosen mask is anxious. what is the best mask?

"majora's mask"

who knows what secrets lurk in the hearts of men???

michael silverblatt said...

i'm only cool with all this shit if it get's turned into a radio show at some point

Austin English said...

to quote ben catmull re that craig thomspon photo

'is that a check or an IOU?'

zero reference said...

Who is Gregory Gallant, and why does he abhor the present? I'd be curious to know!

Jeffrey Meyer said...

"LET'S CREATE A NARRATIVE"

Or - get this - you could NARRATE CREATION

Then you'd be GOD! Boi-oi-oing! Instant hard-on!

zero reference said...

http://boingboing.net/


speaking of boings and hard-ons, boing-boing says our scientists are resurrecting ancient viruses.

surely velociraptors are soon to follow

Jason Overby said...

"Blaise Larmee" is the voltronic art-personality that emerges, Rei Toei-like, from the aggregate data the other members of this blog perpetrate on the Internet.

Charlie Koreman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Charlie Koreman said...

blaise, you say 'the character of that voice is less important than the consistency of that voice' but your own voice in this blog post changes drastically. your turn toward sarcasm and hyperbole at the end seems like you're giving up on trying to communicate.

why is a caricature more engaging than a complex human actor? i'm just sayin said 'masks are healthy' - aren't they faux mysterious as well? who wants to engage with a one dimension character?

you talk about narrative yet you are limiting yourself to a capitalistic narrative. is money really that interesting? there's an infinite number of narratives out there and very few people are interested in this kind. there is no genre for 'capitalistic narrative' because no one cares about it.

better to create a narrative rather than talk about creating it.

Charlie Koreman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Uland said...

To what end should we do any of this? How about we all create work that we truly believe is important ( or, in the very least interesting and worthwhile), talk about that work, wherever it might take you, and simply keep working?
Wait.I forgot, that's EXACTLY WHAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DOING FOR A VERY LONG TIME. The point here is to manufacture, out of cobbled-together abstractions and things we half read while trying to figure out how to get the girl at the coffee shop to like you and PRETEND WE INVENTED SOMETHING NEW.
Worse than being arrogant, all of this is very boring.
JUST MAKE WORK. WORK AT MAKING AND STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY YOURSELF.

This blog should be retitled "OVerheard in the art school dorms".

zero reference said...

@Uland

Yo son, don't be trippin. creating "work we think is important" is what we're about. What you hatin on?
And who, specifically are you talking to? The webz?

The only thing I'm tryin to justify, as you put it, is my thug, ngh.

On the serious tip though, you have some bad grammar:

"The point here is to manufacture, out of cobbled-together

abstractions and things we half read
while trying to figure out how to get the girl at the coffee shop

to like you and PRETEND

WE INVENTED SOMETHING NEW. "

Manufacture what, son? Bad grammar? Unless you meant the point _is to manufacture.

Flame on ngh.

Jeffrey Meyer said...

Tom Toles and Dash Shaw discuss the death of the medium

http://www.mtv.com/videos/real-world-washington-dc-ep-12-white-house-glass-house/1634015/playlist.jhtml

Uland said...

Yeah, I forgot a comma. Still, pretty sure it made far more sense than the post in question.
Keep those radical jpeg triangles comin' "zero reference" ( except to whatever Blaise writes, apparently)...